Food and Drink

Homepage  >  Food and Drink > Milk and Milk Products > PublicationsGlobal milk supply and the UK dairy sector

Publications - Global milk supply and the UK dairy sector

Introduction

The Dairy Supply Chain Forum (DSCF) recently commissioned a piece of work to give the dairy sector an overview on the emerging trends in the global supply of milk and dairy produce. The tender was awarded to the International Farm Comparison Network (IFCN) a German based body that collates statistics on milk production around the world. The report provides a desk-top review of milk supply trends around the world and analyses the competitive position of the UK dairy sector in the light of further trade liberalisation.

Report

Summary

The key findings of this work are:

  • Little milk is traded on world markets (only 7%), although 22% of non perishable products are traded.
  • Liberalisation is likely to see production gravitate from high cost to low cost producers
  • EU and Oceania are the main exporters and are likely to remain so under a more liberalised market
  • Production can be expected to increase in E Europe, Latin America and Oceania. It is likely that there would be a small reduction in EU output under a liberalised world market and a more marked reduction in high cost countries such as Japan and Norway.
  • Marginal costs of production (i.e. those that bridge the gap between 'low' and 'high' costs of production) would tend to drive world market prices because world demand could not be satisfied from the lowest cost producers.
  • Under a liberalised world market, the UK, Ireland and Denmark could be marginal cost commodity producers.

This last finding is the most significant and has provoked the most discussion. The report suggests that while UK milk production costs may not be world beating, they certainly contrast very favourably with most EU competitors and could be sufficient to be marginal in terms of worldwide commodity production costs. This does not mean, of course that the UK would not need to continue to improve its efficiency, but that it would not need to go as far and as fast as some other major EU producers to be competitive, giving the UK at least a short-term edge in the EU market.

There are several caveats to this central conclusion:

  • The methodology employed by IFCN to determine average farm costs takes a very small number of 'typical' farms in each country which may not be fully representative of average or optimum production costs
  • The shortage of economic modelling in the work (although the assumptions on liberalisation are backed up by modelling work reported in another recent piece of work by the OECD)
  • Increases/ decreases in demand are not taken into account nor is the inevitable geographical and local segmentation of markets that ensures milk prices vary regionally and internationally
  • The analysis that world markets under liberalisation would gravitate towards marginal world production costs (or probably US production costs as the largest marginal cost producer) is difficult to establish empirically, although it is economically logical as the cheapest producers are unlikely to be able to fill world demand. This is based partly on an assumption that they may already be working to capacity in terms of land, water or infrastructure or may be affected by political or economic instability
  • There is little empirical data to substantiate the production potential or otherwise of the lowest cost producers such as Argentina or India.

Both the survey by IFCN and the recent report by the OECD conclude that in a fully liberalised world market, prices for the main dairy commodities would all rise significantly. Though a disparity may remain between current EU raw milk prices and those under a liberalised scenario, it would not be as great as it is currently.

The Forum has identified several areas where further analysis is required. These include a better understanding of comparative production costs between the UK and other major international milk producers, manufacturing costs and exchange rate volatility.

Further information is available on our Help page about downloading or reading Adobe Acrobat PDF documents.

 

Page last modified: 23 August 2007

Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs