Food and Drink

Homepage  >  Food and Drink > Regional & local food > Government strategy report - annex

Regional & local food - Government strategy annex

Summary of Stakeholder Responses to Sustainable Food and Farming - Working Together


Section 4: Farming and the Food Chain

4.10 What more should be done by business and Government to expand the range and market share of value-added, niche, regional, local or specialist products?


Action for Government and other interested organisations
  • A strong emphasis should be placed on a co-ordinated Government strategy, with RDAs and FFB playing a lead role, with tourism strategy an important aspect (the Eat the View principle is popular) and with Local Authorities brought into the frame regarding planning permission etc for farmers' markets.
  • More grants and subsidies should be available for regional and local food projects
  • Develop local food sector by "bottom up" approach rather than by central organisation. FFB does not have relevant experience to lead in this area. Instead, give support to local food organisations grouped within Food Links UK in co-operation with Countryside Agency.
  • Concern about the transfer from the CA to FFB of the Eat the View initiative, as FFB lack specific skills of CA.
  • More local abattoirs and processing facilities should be made available
  • Marketing co-ops should be encouraged
  • Business training for diversifying farmers should be provided
  • More funding should be given to the NAFM and the principle of accredited farmers' markets should be supported.
  • DEFRA should have key role in minimising adverse impact of bureaucracy and legislation on those producing and marketing such food
  • The profile of regional and local foods should be raised by means of advertising
  • Two responses indicated that market forces would do all the work and that Government intervention was not necessary.

Regional / Local Food - General Points
  • The emphasis on the difference between "local" and "regional speciality" food is useful as different development strategies must be used.
  • Localness and regionality does add value (an implicit common theme, but only mentioned specifically by a few)
  • Connecting food to its region or method of production offers possibility of raising quality, with these products being sold as widely as possible to the national and international markets. Important to assist the process of connecting small producers to these markets.
  • Defining localness based on shortening the physical distance from producer to consumer. Localness important as a means of encouraging farmers and other food producers to diversify into value-added local marketing, ie. farmers markets and farm shops
  • Distribution is a major stumbling block for local producers. If more funds are allocated to local food groups, provision for local distribution networks/systems could be made and could be organised at county level, not regional.

Need for More Local Sourcing
  • Supermarkets damage regional and local food identities and should be encouraged to do more to source, stock and promote regional, speciality and local food.
  • Schools, hospitals and other local authority bodies should be encouraged to use locally sourced food.

Labelling and EU Protected Food Name Schemes
  • Clear and honest labelling must be used.
  • Greater use should be made of the EU Protected Food Name Schemes
Regional and Local Foods Branch, AERF Division, December 2002

Page last modified: 23 August 2007

Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs