Disease factsheet: Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD)
If you suspect signs of any notifiable disease, you must immediately notify a Defra Divisional Veterinary Manager.
- Introduction
- After-effects of the disease
- Clinical signs
- Spread of disease
- Disease prevention
- Special precautions within an Infected Area
- Early Notification
- Precautions
- Legislation
- Disease Control Strategy
- Outbreak Management
- Vaccination
- Contingency planning
Introduction
Foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) is an acute infectious disease, which causes fever, followed by the development of vesicles (blisters) - chiefly in the mouth and on the feet. The disease is caused by a virus of which there are seven 'types', each producing the same symptoms, and distinguishable only in the laboratory.
Serological tests in laboratories have identified seven different serotypes as O, A., C, SAT1, SAT2, SAT3, and Asia 1.
FMD is probably more infectious than any other disease affecting man or animals and spreads rapidly if uncontrolled. Among farm stock, cattle, sheep, pigs, goats and deer are susceptible. Elephants, hedgehogs, rats and any wild cloven-footed animals can also contract it. FMD is endemic in parts of Asia, Africa, the Middle East and South America, with sporadic outbreaks in disease-free areas.
The interval between exposure to infection and the appearance of symptoms varies between twenty-four hours and ten days, or even longer. The average time, under natural conditions, is three to six days.
After-effects of the disease
Foot-and-mouth disease is rarely fatal, except in the case of very young animals, which may die without showing any symptoms. Exceptionally, a severe form of the disease may cause sudden deaths among older stock.
The after-effects of FMD are serious. In addition to treating and nursing a herd or flock of sick animals, a reduction in the milk yield in a dairy herd will certainly be experienced, at least until the next lactation. Mastitis may develop and the value of a cow is permanently reduced. In some cases chronic heart disease occurs. The raw surfaces left on the foot when the blisters burst are likely to become infected; this may lead to lameness and loss of a hoof.
Clinical signs
Cattle
In the early stage, a rise in temperature is noticed and the animal is dull, blowing slightly and off its food. A cow in milk will show a sudden drop in yield. Blisters begin to develop, usually within a few hours, most frequently on the upper surface of the tongue and the bulbs of the heels. Feeding and cudding may cease and the animal is 'tucked up' with staring coat. If at pasture, the animal will be away from the rest of the herd, and probably lying down. There is quivering of the lips and uneasy movement of the lower jaw, with copius, frothy saliva around the lips that drips to the ground at intervals a smacking sound is produced by partial opening of the mouth.
About the same time there is evidence of pain in the feet. The animal lies down constantly and, when forced to move, walks very tenderly, occasionally shaking a leg as if to dislodge some object wedged between the clays. Lameness usually gets worse, until the animal can only hobble when moving on hard or uneven surfaces. Loss of condition is marked, partly on account of the fever and partly because the mouth is so painful that the animal is afraid to eat. Cows and heifers may develop blisters on the teats and resent any attempt at milking.
If the mouth is examined in the early stages, blisters on the dental pad, inside the lips, and sometimes on the muzzle, will be found, as well as those on the upper surface of the tongue. At first the blisters are seen as small raised areas, whitish in colour and containing fluid: they quickly increase in size until they may be as big as half a walnut. Two or more blisters may join to form a larger one, sometimes covering half the surface of the tongue. Later, the blisters burst and collapse, leaving the 'skin' loose and wrinkled, with a dead appearance. On handling, the 'skin' is easily removed, leaving a raw surface underneath. When the blisters have burst the temperature falls, pain decreases and the animal may start to eat again.
The blisters develop on the feet about the same time as in the mouth, or a little later; they rarely appear first. Most commonly they occur at the bulbs of the heels, at the front of the cleft of the hoof, and in the cleft itself. They usually burst fairly quickly through movement of the feet, and then appear as a ragged tear exposing a raw surface.
Sheep
The chief symptom is a sudden, severe lameness, affecting one or more legs. The animal looks sick, lies down frequently and is very unwilling to rise. Usually, the disease affects all four feet, and when the animal is made to rise, it stands in a half-crouching position, with the hind legs brought well forward, and seems afraid to move. Mouth symptoms are not often noticeable. There are blisters on the feet at the top of the hoof, where the horn joins the skin in the cleft of the foot. They may extend all round the coronet, and when they burst the horn is separated from the tissues underneath, and the hair round the hoof is damp. Unless complicated by foot rot, the foot is clean and there is no offensive smell. Blisters in the mouth, when they do develop, form on the dental pad and sometimes the tongue.
Pigs
The chief symptom in pigs is sudden lameness. The animal prefers to lie down and when made to move squeals loudly and hobbles painfully, though lameness may not be so obvious where the pigs are on deep bedding or soft ground. The blisters form on the upper edge of the hoof, where the skin and horn meet, and on the heels and in the cleft. They may extend right round the hoof head, with the result that the horn becomes detached.
At a later stage new horn starts to grow and the old hoof is carried down and finally shed. The process resembles the loss of a fingernail following some blow or other injury. Mouth symptoms are not usually visible, but blisters may develop on the snout or on the tongue.
It is important to remember that the disease known as Swine Vesicular Disease, which first occurred in this country in 1972, has identical symptoms to foot-and-mouth disease. Therefore anyone who sees vesicular disease in pigs must report the sighting and treat the condition as suspected foot-and-mouth disease until laboratory tests prove otherwise.
Spread of disease
The virus is present in great quantity in the fluid from the blisters, and it can also occur in the saliva, milk and dung. Contamination of any objects with any of these discharges is a danger to other stock. At the height of the disease, virus is present in the blood and all parts of the body. Heat, sunlight and disinfectants will destroy the virus, whereas cold and darkness tend to keep it alive. Under favourable conditions it can survive for long periods.
Airborne spread of the virus can take place and under favourable climatic conditions the disease may be spread several miles by this route. Animals pick up the virus either by direct contact with an infected animal, or by contact with foodstuffs or other things which have been contaminated by such an animal, or by eating or coming into contact with some part of an infected carcase.
Foot-and-mouth disease is extremely infectious. A very small quantity of the virus is capable of infecting an animal, and it is easy to realise how rapidly the disease could spread throughout the country if no attempt were made to control it.
Trucks, lorries, market places, and loading ramps - in or over which infected animals have travelled - are dangerous until disinfected. Roads may also become contaminated, and virus may be picked up and carried on the wheels of passing vehicles.
The boots, clothing, and hands of a stockman who has attended diseased animals can spread the disease: and dogs, cats, poultry, wild game and vermin may also carry infection. Further information on the 2001 FMD outbreak.
Disease prevention
In countries like Great Britain, where the disease arises only as the result of imported infection, the accepted policy is to stamp it out by slaughtering all affected stock and any others which have been exposed to such risk of infection that it is reasonably certain that they would develop the disease if left alive. Full compensation is paid for animals slaughtered.
Disinfection of the infected premises takes place. In addition to this, Defra imposes restrictions on the movement of animals within and into an area which extends for a radius of not less than 10 kilometres around the infected place, and no movement of animals out of this area is permitted. In exceptional circumstances restrictions have to be imposed over a much wider area.
Special precautions within an Infected Area
In order to prevent the spread of foot-and-mouth disease there are special precautions that all producers of milk in an Infected Area must take. Milk from cows in the incubation stage of the disease can contain foot-and-mouth disease virus for a few days before the symptoms become evident. It is therefore important that milk producers take all precautions necessary It is important for slaughterhouse and knacker's yard owners and managers to realise that if the slaughterhouse or knacker's yard they operate is within an Infected Area no carcase or animal product (other than a carcase intended for human consumption) or manure, slurry or litter may be moved from the premises unless an inspector of the Defra authorises the movement by granting a licence. The Defra would grant such a licence only if it considered that there was no risk in spreading foot-and-mouth disease in the disposal of such products.
On declaration of an Infected Area all Artificial Insemination services, including the servicing of farm storage flasks, within that area must be immediately suspended and not resumed until the Defra have issued licences to do so. These licences may impose particular conditions on the inseminators or semen delivery personnel, or limit the areas in which they may work. Inseminators' field flasks which have been used on farms in the infected area may be placed under restrictions. Under certain circumstances the Farm Gate AI Service will be permitted. This means that special insemination kits can be delivered to the farm gate on the condition that the semen must only be used by the owner or his full time employee and must not taken off the farm. Semen already on the farm in farm storage flasks may continue to be used by the licensee, but not by a visiting inseminator or veterinary surgeon..
Since the epidemic of 1967-68, legislation provides that vaccination is normally prohibited, but may be sanctioned by the EU Commission as an additional means of arresting the spread of the disease. If a decision to vaccinate was taken, the Defra would vaccinate, free of charge, all susceptible stock within the area considered to be at risk.
Early notification
The success of the slaughter policy depends on the prompt reporting of all suspected cases of disease. Delay allows the disease to get a start that is very difficult to overtake. Stock owners should therefore be constantly on the watch for any suspicious symptoms among their animals, even when the country is free from outbreaks of the disease.
Special care is necessary with sheep and pigs where lameness is often the only symptom. It must be remembered that pigs will 'go off their legs' for various reasons, and that foot-and-mouth disease is one of them; also that sheep can be lame from foot rot and foot-and-mouth disease at the same time. Owners of livestock should always be suspicious when one or more pigs or sheep become lame suddenly and the lameness starts to spread through the herd or flock.
The owner of a suspected animal or carcase must by law to report the fact to the Defra Divisional Veterinary Manager. The owner is not expected to diagnose the disease, but he ought to know enough about the disease to suspect it. All owners and stockmen should make themselves familiar with the symptoms, and call in a veterinary surgeon as early as possible; they should never ask another stock-owner to look at the suspected animal.
If the suspicion is strong it is better to report at once to the Defra's Divisional Veterinary Manager for the area who will immediately arrange, without cost to the owner, for the examination of the suspected animal.
The Defra's veterinary staff are available at all times, and no one should be tempted, especially in the late afternoon, to wait and see if there is any change in the animal's condition by next morning.
Precautions
Before the Veterinary Officer arrives there are steps that owners should take at once to lessen the risk of spreading the disease. The suspected animal must be isolated, and no one who has been in contact with it should be allowed to go among other stock. If the suspected animal is in an outlying pasture and has been there for some days, it is better to leave it where it is, provided the fences are sound. A suspected animal must not be moved on or across a public road.
No animals, vehicles, foodstuffs, milk etc., must be moved from the suspected premises and, if possible, no person should leave. Dogs, cats, and poultry must be shut in or tied up. Anyone leaving for some essential purpose must first thoroughly cleanse and disinfect his boots, wash his hands and if practicable, change his clothing before leaving the premises. Special care should be taken to see that boots are really clean, and that no dirt or dung is left on the under-surface or in the grooves on the soles of rubber boots. Any disinfectant which indicates on the container label that it is approved for use against foot-and-mouth disease, or a solution of washing soda in hot water -one heaped double handful of soda in a two-gallon (nine litre) bucket of water - can be used.
A notice with the words FOOT-AND-MOUTH DISEASE - KEEP OUT must be displayed at the main entrances. Nobody must be allowed to enter the premises, neither should vehicles (for example milk tankers, milk lorries, cattle floats, and lorries with feedingstuffs) be allowed to enter. If there is no main gate that can be shut, a rope or chain could be strung across the entrance. In short, the aim should be "nothing in, nothing out' until the Veterinary Officer arrives. Neighbouring owners who hear reports of disease should restrict movements of their stock as far as possible, and keep them off roads in the vicinity. It is better to leave outlying stock where they are, unless they can be moved further from the suspected premises without coming into contact with the main herd.
Legislation
Animal Health Act 1981
The Animal Health Act 1981 provides the powers for the control of FMD.
The 1981 Act, together with the FMD (England) Order 2006, which is made under it provides for the following measures:
- Power of entry to premises for the purpose of veterinary inquiry;
- slaughter of affected, suspected or exposed animals;
- seizure and control of affected carcases and things;
- cleansing and disinfection of premises, vehicles and people;
- movement controls on people, animals and vehicles;
- slaughter (and payment of compensation) of animals on welfare grounds arising as a result of movement controls;
- other controls in a number of control zones.
Animal Health Act 2002
The Animal Health Act 2002 amended the Animal Health Act 1981 and supplemented its existing powers by allowing animals to be slaughtered wherever this is necessary to prevent the spread of disease.
However, the 2002 Act amendments require the Secretary of State to publish the reasons for using this preventive slaughter power, prior to exercising it. Emergency vaccination would have to be considered prior to any preventive slaughter powers, and, if not used, the reasons would have to be published.
The 2002 Act amendments allow vaccinated animals to be slaughtered and require compensation at the market value for such animals to be paid. They also provided for the publication and annual review of this Contingency Plan and required the publication of Biosecurity guidance. They strengthen enforcement powers, including improved powers of entry to farms; require reasonable assistance for the purposes of slaughter, vaccination and testing; and increase penalties.
European Union (EU) Legislation
Council Directive 2003/85/EC, adopted in September 2003, updated measures contained in previous Directives, taking into account scientific progress and experience gained in eradicating the disease in the EU in 2001. It sets out minimum control measures Member States must take against FMD and allows stricter measures to be taken if the disease situation requires it. It requires rapid action to be taken as soon as disease is suspected, including movement controls.
The ban on prophylactic (routine) vaccination, which has been in place across the EU since 1992, is maintained in the new Directive, though emergency vaccination is moved to the forefront of our control strategies in the event of an outbreak. However, under both Directive 85/511 and Directive 2003/85 the required basic disease control policy is the slaughter of all susceptible animals on premises infected with FMD and those identified as “dangerous contacts”.
Other features of Directive 2003/85 include:
- provision for the adoption of “special measures” (including possible protective emergency vaccination and derogation from slaughter) to be applied in premises including laboratories, zoos, and wildlife parks and to allow the conservation of “farm animal genetic resources”
the requirement for Member States “to prepare all arrangements necessary for emergency vaccination in an area at least the size of the Surveillance Zone” as soon as the first case of FMD is confirmed.
- details of the treatment required for animal health reasons for meat and meat products and milk and milk products from animals from the Protection, Surveillance and Vaccination Zones. Such treatments include heat treatment or deboning and maturation of meat and pasteurisation of milk.
Secondary Legislation
Council Directive 2003/85 was transposed into domestic legislation in late 2005/early 2006 by the introduction of three separate pieces of secondary legislation:
The Animal Health Act 1981 (Amendment) Regulations 2005 - These Regulations take account of the Directive by making a minor technical amendment to the Animal Health Act 1981 to change the Secretary of State’s previous discretion to slaughter susceptible animals on infected premises to a duty to slaughter on infected premises only. This does not represent any change to policy but is merely to bring the 1981 Act into line with the Directive. The amendments made by the Regulations also allow certain exceptions to this duty to slaughter in laboratories, zoos, wildlife parks, for rare breeds and separate production units.
The Foot and Mouth Disease (Control of Vaccination) (England) Regulations 2006 (PDF Link to the OPSI website) - These transpose the vaccination provisions of the Directive. The Regulations move the potential use of emergency vaccination to the forefront of disease control, as an adjunct to the basic slaughter policy. The Regulations ban vaccination except under licence by the Secretary of State and also ban the export of vaccinated animals to other EU or EEA states. The Regulations also similarly provide for zones of control, both for where vaccination takes place and where it is expressly prohibited, and introduces treatments for meat and other animal products from vaccinated animals.
Foot and Mouth Disease (England) Order 2006 - This transposes the bulk of the FMD Directive, as well as some additional provisions preserved from the FMD Order 1983 (which is repealed). Under the Order, the slaughter of susceptible animals on infected premises remains the principal tool for tackling an FMD outbreak. The Order sets out the procedures and controls required on suspicion and confirmation of FMD and provides for a number of zones of different levels of control. In particular, the Order introduces a number of treatments, such as heat treatment (cooking) and deboning and maturation, that have to be applied to meat and other animal products from infected areas.
Further information regarding the legislation is available.
The Animal By-Products Order 1999 (as amended)
This Order prohibits the feeding to livestock of certain categories of catering waste whether that waste has been processed or unprocessed. It also removes the possibility of non-mammalian animal by-products being rendered for the production of swill for feeding to pigs or poultry.
The Foot-and-Mouth Disease (Packing Materials) Orders of 1925 and 1926
These require all hay or straw which has been used as packing to be kept away from all animals and, unless it is used again as packing, or returned in a crate or box to be so used again, to be destroyed. No trees, plants etc., packed in straw or hay may be exposed for sale or stored in any place where animals are exposed for sale.
The Transport of Animals (Cleansing and Disinfection) (England) Order 2003
The Order specifies that vehicles and equipment used to transport animals must, with very few exceptions, be cleansed and if necessary disinfected after the animals have been unloaded and before any further animals are loaded. This principle is one of the mainstays of this country's policy on the prevention of the spread of animal diseases and has been for many years.
Disease Control Strategy
The disease control strategy adopted will be consistent with the UK’s EU obligations and in line with the new FMD legislation which transposed Directive 2003/85. The Government’s objective in tackling any fresh outbreaks of FMD will be to eradicate the disease as quickly as possible and to maintain the UK’s disease-free status. In doing so, the Government will seek to select a control strategy which:
- causes the least possible disruption to the food, farming and tourism industries, to visitors to the countryside, and to rural communities and the wider economy;
- minimises the number of animals which need to be slaughtered, either to control the disease or on welfare grounds, and which keeps animal welfare problems to a minimum;
- minimises damage to the environment and protects public health;
- minimises the burden on taxpayers and the public at large.
The table below indicates the local veterinary action to be taken in relation to the level of suspicion.
Summary of initial action on suspect cases
| Level | FMD |
| 0 | All restrictions on premises lifted no further action. |
| 1 | Suspect animal(s) left alive and observed. Samples submitted for
laboratory diagnosis. Premises restrictions imposed. Impose temporary control zone (Form C) |
| 2 | Suspect animal(s) showing typical lesions are killed. Samples submitted
for laboratory diagnosis. Premises restrictions imposed. Impose temporary control zone (Form C) |
| 3 | All susceptible livestock on the premises are pre-emptively slaughtered.
Samples submitted for laboratory diagnosis. Premises restrictions imposed. Impose temporary control zone (Form C) |
| 4 | Disease confirmed on clinical grounds only without awaiting laboratory
results. Samples submitted for laboratory diagnosis. Premises restrictions imposed. Area restrictions imposed All susceptible livestock on the premises slaughtered. Dangerous contacts traced and slaughtered depending on veterinary assessment. |
Control Policies
On suspicion of disease the Secretary of State will make a declaration establishing a Temporary Control Zone around the suspect premises. This will be of a size considered necessary to prevent the spread of disease. Within the Temporary Control Zone movements of animals to and from premises (including into or out of the zone) are not allowed. A Supplementary Movement Control zone may also be established, restricting the movement of animals in a wider area.
On confirmation of disease the following control policies will be applied:
- Diseased and other susceptible animals on infected premises will be culled with a target of within 24 hours of report. Those identified as dangerous contacts will be culled with a target of within 48 hours of report;
- Disposal by incineration will be implemented immediately with rendering as the next option and other disposal routes being available as an additional resource subject to environmental, land use planning and public health considerations:
- A Protection Zone will be imposed with a minimum radius of 3km around the Infected Premises and a Surveillance Zone with a minimum radius of 10km. In the Protection Zone no animal movements will be allowed except for movement to emergency slaughter. In both the Protection and Surveillance Zones, there will be requirements for increased levels of biosecurity on farms, cleansing and disinfection (C&D) of vehicles, people and machinery moving on/off farms. Movement of animals, animal products, feed and bedding will be prohibited, except under licence. Products from animals in these zones will be subject to treatment to ensure destruction of the FMD virus. This is an animal health measure rather than a public health measure. Such treatments include the pasteurisation of milk (normal process for most milk produced in the UK), heat treatment or de-boning and maturation of meat in certain circumstances.
Footpaths will only be closed on Infected Premises and within the 3km Protection Zone, (A Veterinary Risk Assessment and Protocol for Rights of Way closure is at Volume 1: Generic Plan, Annex G.
Export health certificates for animals and animal products will be withdrawn. Exports from GB of susceptible animals during the risk period will be identified and notified to the importing countries.
Additional control strategies which might be employed include:
- culling of other susceptible livestock exposed to the disease (e.g. premises under virus plumes, premises adjoining the infected premises); and
- pre-emptive or ‘firebreak’ culling of animals not on infected premises, not dangerous contacts or not necessarily exposed to the disease, in order to prevent the wider spread of the disease outwith an area.
Further action will depend on the circumstances of a particular outbreak and on scientific and veterinary advice. The Decision Tree for FMD control strategies (Volume 2: FMD Annex A & B) will be followed in deciding what action to take. This sets out the factors the Government will take into account in deciding which strategy to adopt in order to control and eradicate the disease. The Animal Health Act 1981, as amended by the Animal Health Act 2002, lays a duty on the Secretary of State to consider vaccination as a means of preventing the spread of the disease. This option will be considered based upon emerging epidemiological and logistical factors and wherever possible this would be on the basis of emergency vaccinate-to-live. If a decision not to vaccinate were taken the reasons would be explained before further measures were introduced.
Consultation with interested parties, to address outstanding technical, commercial and communications issues on emergency vaccination is continuing.
Further details of Outbreak Management.
Vaccination
Information on vaccination policy is available.
Contingency planning
Defra's revised Contingency Plan for Exotic Animal Diseases was laid before Parliament on 10th December 2007. The plan covers arrangements for dealing with a range of exotic animal diseases, including Foot and Mouth Disease, Avian Influenza and, for the first time, Rabies and Bluetongue. Further information...
In June 2004 Defra held a national exercise to test its contingency plan for Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD). Exercise Hornbeam tested Defra's response in the event of an outbreak of FMD at strategic, tactical, and operational levels. Lessons learned from the exercise were published in December 2004. Final report is available (PDF 689 KB).
See also
- Summary profile for Foot and Mouth Disease (PDF 24 KB)
- FMD Veterinary risk assessment and protocol for rights of way closure.
- Outbreak Statistics
- World Organisation for Animal Health (OIE)
- Institute for Animal Health
Page last modified: November 1, 2008
